CISD Board Meeting Monitor Constituent summaries of Conroe ISD board meetings
← All Meetings
Unofficial summaries generated from public board meeting records. Not affiliated with or endorsed by Conroe Independent School District.

January 28, 2025 — Regular Meeting

Conroe Independent School District Board of Trustees — Regular Meeting

View interactive version →

Conroe ISD Board Meeting — 2025-01-28

Regular Meeting — Unofficial Notes

Based on auto-generated transcript. Not an official record.

Generated 2026-03-28 17:58 UTC


Unofficial Meeting Notes

Conroe ISD School Health Advisory Council (SHAC) Meeting

January 28, 2025 — Regular Meeting

Note: These are unofficial notes based on an auto-generated transcript of the meeting. They are not official minutes of the Conroe ISD Board of Trustees but rather a meeting of the School Health Advisory Council (SHAC), which reports to the Board.


Attendance & Opening

Facilitator (pre-officer election): Mark Merl, Executive Director of Operations

A roll call was conducted for the large group. Approximately 55+ members were present, including parents, teachers, nurses, counselors, administrators, and district staff. A quorum was confirmed.

Key district staff/advisors present:


Board President's Welcome (Video Message)

Board President Odenweller delivered remarks via video, as she was unable to attend in person. Key points:


Deputy Superintendent Remarks

Dr. Bethany Medford thanked members for their time commitment and travel, stated the district is there to serve and work with SHAC, and welcomed the group's productivity.


Item 3: Approval of October 8, 2024 Meeting Minutes

Motion to approve: Christina Davis-Kanam

Second: Jennifer Blackman

Discussion:

Vote (Roll Call):


Item: Community Feedback Summary

Dr. Merl reported on emails received through SHAC's public email address:

1. Membership question — Responded regarding normal membership process and timeline

2. Latex in cafeteria — Question about use of latex gloves and latex balloons for students with allergies. Response: The district uses alternatives and vinyl gloves as well.

3. Wellness Plan question — Regarding food and physical activity used as punishment/reward. Addressed with the individual and the campus.


Item: Selection of Parent Officers

Chair

Discussion on term limits:

Discussion on bylaws history:

Motion to elect Dr. Bryce Spear as Chair: Ashley Heinen

Second: Tina Araujo

Vote (Roll Call):

Co-Chair

Secretary


Item: Wellness Plan Review and Discussion

Background (presented by Dr. Merl and Barbara Robertson):

Discussion — Key Concerns Raised:

1. Goal 6 (PE requirements): Susan Moore (music teacher) asked about an undefined asterisk in the draft language about 30 minutes daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity vs. 135 minutes weekly for PreK–6. Wade Haymark confirmed the asterisk appears to be a typo; the language mirrors TEA guidance that campuses can choose either standard.

2. Campus scheduling/safety concerns: Dr. Kesy (principal) noted that her campus cannot safely schedule 30 minutes daily PE due to enrollment size and facilities. Texas Education Code allows alternatives (e.g., 225 minutes over two weeks with block scheduling). Her campus exceeds this with 275 minutes over two weeks.

3. Implementation gaps in current plan: Brent Maddox raised concerns that the current Wellness Plan contains goals that are not being followed in practice. He cited the example of food safety requirements — the plan and handbooks say all food provided to students must be store-bought or from commercial kitchens, yet at least one high school principal and assistant superintendent have permitted homemade food from other students' parents, contradicting this policy. He argued the group should first identify where the current plan fails before creating a new one.

4. Food/physical activity as reward/punishment: A member noted the WellSAT scored the district on policies about using food or physical activity as rewards/punishments, but the draft plan removed or weakened that language. Concerns raised about equity for students with physical disabilities.

5. Compliance concerns: Dr. Spear stated she reviewed FFA local policy and has concerns about whether the draft plan fully complies with legal requirements, particularly regarding benchmarks and district standards for food and beverages. She noted having a master's in health law and policy.

6. Feasibility concerns: A member (Kim Cameron) urged the group to be realistic about recommendations given funding constraints — the general allotment hasn't changed since 2019 and the state has withheld potential funding.

7. Not all members had adequate time to review: Several members noted they had not had sufficient time to compare the old plan, new draft, and triennial assessment data.

Motion to Table:

Motion: To table the Wellness Plan approval and form a work group to review the plan with the intent of presenting a completed, comprehensive plan at the March SHAC meeting.

Moved by: (Member — name unclear from transcript)

Second: (Member — name unclear from transcript)

Discussion on the motion:

Vote (Roll Call):


Item: SHAC Subcommittees

Per the bylaws, four standing subcommittees exist:

1. Membership

2. Bylaws

3. Physical Activity and Fitness

4. Compliance

Additionally, based on member interest:

5. Mental Health / Suicide Awareness & Prevention — to be added to the sign-up survey

Dr. Spear will send a Google poll/sign-up sheet for members to indicate interest. Key points:


Requests for Future Agenda Items

1. Cell Phone Policy Review — Brent Maddox and others requested revisiting the cell phone work from two years ago, citing new technologies, studies, and implementation concerns. Specifically, Maddox noted that parents cannot restrict their children's phone access at school when teachers are using phones as part of classroom instruction.

- Dr. Kesy cautioned that the previous cell phone work was extensive and the policy is still relatively new; she recommended first gathering implementation data from campuses before reopening the policy.

- Dr. Spear agreed and will coordinate with Dr. Medford (who led the district cell phone committee) to gather campus implementation data for the March meeting.

2. Bullying — A member noted that work on bullying had started previously and suggested continuing that effort.

3. District/Administrative Input — A member asked whether district staff or administrators have identified areas they feel are weak or in need of SHAC attention, suggesting the district share those priorities.


SHAC Communication Reminder

Dr. Spear reiterated the Board President's directive:

Dr. Spear noted she is available by email anytime and encouraged members to reach out.


Adjournment

Motion to adjourn: Made and seconded (members not clearly identified)

Vote: Approved by voice/acclamation

Meeting adjourned at approximately 6:00 PM


Summary of Key Actions & Outcomes

| Item | Action | Outcome |

|------|--------|---------|

| October 2024 Minutes | Vote to approve with clarifying language on HB 3908/CATCH curriculum | Approved (multiple abstentions from absent members) |

| SHAC Chair Election | Dr. Bryce Spear nominated and elected | Approved unanimously |

| SHAC Co-Chair | No nominations | Position left vacant |

| SHAC Secretary | Ryan continued in role | Retained by consensus |

| Wellness Plan | Motion to table and form work group | Approved (near-unanimous, 1 abstention) |

| Subcommittees | Sign-up to be distributed via email | Pending |

| Cell Phone Policy | Data on implementation to be gathered for March meeting | Pending |

| Communication Protocol | All data/info requests to go through Chair → Board President | Noted |


Next Meeting: March 2025 (specific date TBD)

Expected agenda items: